Application of 22 level factorial design
in formulation and evaluation of spherical agglomerates by solvent change
method
Swapnil Shankar Patil*, Lalita B. Patil, Manoj M. Nitalikar, Chandrakant S. Magdum,
Shrinivas K. Mohite
Rajarambapu College of Pharmacy, Kasegaon Tal – Walwa Dist- Sangli (Maharashtra)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: swapnil.patil0707@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Candesartan cilexetil is an
antihypertensive drug, which exhibit poor water solubility, poor flowability and poor dissolution. The main aim of study was
to improve the dissolution of Candesartan cilexetil. Spherical agglomerates containing Candesartan cilexetil were
prepared by solvent change method. By using ternary phase diagram ratio of
solvent addition was maintained. Drug was dissolved in solvent blend of
methanol (good solvent), water (poor solvent), dichloromethane (bridging
liquid). The formulated agglomerates were characterized by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), x-ray diffraction
(XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and In-vitro dissolution studies. It was found that the B2 batch has
shown better results with respect to all the parameters. Spherical
agglomeration and crystallization process can be used to enhance water
solubility, flowability and thereby dissolution.
KEY WORDS: Spherical agglomerates, solvent change method,
scanning electron microscopy, in-vitro
dissolution, etc.
INTRODUCTION:
Drugs from BCS class 2 having poor
solubility in water and less dissolution profile1. Due to which,
therapeutic effect is not achieved in the body that leads to inadequate
therapy. To enhance dissolution profile of drug several solubility enhancement
methods are in practice.2,3 Spherical agglomeration is one of the
proven technique adopted to increase the solubility and dissolution rate of
poorly soluble drug. Spherical agglomeration process improve the flowability and compressibility of drug.4
Spherical agglomeration is multiple unit
process in which crystallization, agglomeration and spheronization can
be carried out simultaneously.5 Formulated crystals can be called as
spherical agglomerates. Spherical crystallization technique has been
successfully utilized for improving of flowability
and compressibility of drug. These technique may enable crystalline forms of a
drug to be converted into different polymeric form having better
bioavailability.6
Spherical agglomeration is a novel particle
design method developed by Kawashima et.al. It is also come under particle
engineering technique in which crystallization and agglomeration carried out
simultaneously.7 Many of the drugs administered by oral route
because oral route administration is most convenient route for solid dosage
forms. The basic requirement for commercial production of tablet is a
particulate solid with good flowability, mechanical
strength and compressibility.8 Hence is necessary to evaluate and
manipulate the above said properties. To impart these properties the drugs are
subjected to particle design techniques, spherical crystallization is one the
techniques of particle design. Formulated agglomerates will improve the flowability and compressibility of drug which enables the
direct tabletting of drug. It minimize the process in
tabletting like mixing, granulation, drying and
sieving etc. There are main four principle steps involved in the process of
spherical crystallization like - 1) flocculation zone, 2) zero growth zone, 3)
fast growth zone, 4) constant size zone.9, 10 Direct tabletting is preferred process for spherical agglomerates.
It will minimize the cost of production and save time as compared to granule tabletting.
There are different methods of preparation
of spherical agglomerates like
1) Solvent
change method
2) Quasi emulsion
solvent diffusion method
3) Ammonia
diffusion method
4)
Neutralization method
5)
Traditional crystallization process
6) Crystallo-co-agglomeration
A saturated solution of drug in a good
solvent is poured is bad solvent. The good solvent and poor solvent are freely
miscible in each other.11 In these method a third solvent bridging
liquid is added in above mixture in small amount to induce and promote the
formation of agglomerates. Depending upon the addition of amount of bridging
liquid and speed of rotation size of agglomerates varying. There are different
two type of factors will depend upon the size of the agglomerates one is
rotation speed and another is amount bridging liquid. If speed of rotation in the formulation is
increased then small size of agglomerates will formed and if speed will less
particle size will increased.10,11 Also if less amount of bridging
liquid is added in the mixture then large size particle are formed and if more
amount of bridging liquid is added then small size particle will be formed. It
is always necessary to maintain the ternary phase diagram ratio at the time of
addition of three solvents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Candesartan cilexetil was
obtained as a gift sample from Lupin Pharmaceuticals,
Aurangabad. Polyvinyl-Pyrrolidone K-30,
dichloromethane and methanol were procured was obtained from Research-Lab Fine
Chemicals, Mumbai.
Preparation
of spherical agglomerates of Candesartan cilexetil
Physical mixture of Candesartan
cilexetil is prepared by dissolving 1 gm of drug in
50 ml of methanol then respective amount of PVP-K30 (as per batch) is been
dissolved in 40 ml of water then first solution is poured in polymeric mixture
then precipitate is formed. Then this solution is kept for stirring on
mechanical stirrer for 1 hr. (as per respective rpm) at that time
simultaneously 10 ml of dichloromethane (Bridging liquid) is added dropwise. It will start to form spherical agglomerates
after 1 hr filter the solution and dry at room temperature for 24 hrs.
Table no. 1. Preparation of
batches of spherical agglomerates
|
Sr. no. |
Batch no. |
Candesartan cilexetil (gm) |
PVP-K30 (gm) |
Speed (rpm) |
Drug : polymer |
|
1 |
B1 |
1 |
3 |
600 |
1:3 |
|
2 |
B2 |
1 |
1 |
600 |
1:1 |
|
3 |
B3 |
1 |
3 |
400 |
1:3 |
|
4 |
B4 |
1 |
1 |
400 |
1:1 |
Experimental design for the preparation of Spherical Agglomerates
In the present work, 22
factorial design (table no. 2) was used to optimize the batch. A two factor and
two levels full factorial design was used and four experimental runs were
performed. Two dependent and independent factors were selected. Two independent
parameters Polyvinylpyrrolidone (X1) and speed (X2)
were selected and particle size (Y1) and drug release (Y2) were dependent
parameters selected.
Table No.2: Design layout for 22
factorial designs.
|
Batch no. |
Coded value |
Actual value |
||
|
X1 |
X2 |
Polyvinylpyrrolidone |
Speed |
|
|
F1 |
+1 |
+1 |
3 |
600 |
|
F2 |
-1 |
+1 |
1 |
600 |
|
F3 |
+1 |
-1 |
3 |
400 |
|
F4 |
-1 |
-1 |
1 |
400 |
a.
Determination of λ max
Stock
solution of 100µg/ml was prepared by adding 10 mg of pure Candesartan
cilexetil in 100 ml of solvent methanol. Then 1ml of
stock solution was diluted to 10 ml of methanol to make 10µg/ml solution. Then
this solution was filtered and scanned in UV spectrum. The scanning range was 200-400nm. The maximum absorbance
was recorded.
b.
Percentage practical yield
Percentage practical yields were calculated
to know about percent yield or efficiency of the method, thus it helps in selection
of appropriate method of production. Prepared particles were collected and
weighed to determine practical yield (PY) from the following equation
Practical yield
Practical yield (%) =
-----------------------X 100
Theoretical yield
c.
Determination of % drug content
Spherical agglomerates equivalent to 32 mg
of Candesartan cilexetil were weighed accurately and dissolved in
suitable quantity of solvent mixture methanol. The drug content was determined
at 217 nm by UV spectrophotometer. Each sample analyzed in triplicate. The
percent drug content was determined using the following equation:
Practical Drug
content
% Drug content
=-------------------------------X 100
Theoretical
Drug content
d. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR):
FTIR has been used to assess the
interaction between drug and carrier molecules in the solid state. Infrared
spectra of agglomerated powder were obtained using FTIR spectrometer (FTIR Jasco 4100). About 2-4 mg of moisture free agglomerated
sample was mixed with dry potassium bromide and FTIR spectra were obtained by KBr pellet method. The scanning range was 400-4000 cm-1.
e.
Powder X-ray diffraction :
To evaluate the crystallinity
of Candesartan cilexetil the PXRD study was carried out by using X
ray diffractometer. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns
were recorded on Brucker D2 Phaser
X-diffractometer.
f. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM):
SEM of Spherical agglomerates was carried
out using JSM 6360, JEOL India Pvt. Ltd. to study the morphological
characteristics of the optimized batch of agglomerates.
g.
In-vitro dissolution
studies of Prepared Spherical Agglomerates:
In-vitro dissolution studies of Spherical
agglomerates of Candesartan cilexetil
were carried out for 60 minutes using USP Dissolution test apparatus type II
(Lab India DS8000, eight stages) at 50 rpm. Spherical agglomerates equivalent
to 32 mg of Candesartan cilexetil
was used for dissolution studies at 37±0.5°C in 900ml of pH 6.8 buffers as
dissolution medium. Aliquots equal to 5 ml was withdrawn at regular time
intervals (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mins), an equal
volume of fresh dissolution medium was replaced to maintain the sink condition
and aliquots were measured at 257 nm UV/Visible spectrophotometer. The
dissolution studies were conducted in triplicate and the mean values were
plotted versus time.4
RESULT AND DISCUSSION;
a.
Organoleptic properties
All test for Organoleptic
properties containing color, odor, taste, state, solubility are complied with
the Indian pharmacopeia. The melting point of pure drug Candesartan
cilexetil was found in the standard range as per
Indian pharmacopeia.
b.
Determination of λ max of Candesartan cilexetil
The standard solution of Candesartan cilexetil of
concentration 10µg/ml showed maximum absorbance at the wavelength 217 nm.fig 1.
Shows λ max of Candesartan cilexetil.5
Fig no.1. λ max of Candesartan
cilexetil
c. Percentage practical yield
The result of percent
practical yield studies are shown in table.3. The percent practical yield of
the prepared spherical agglomerates by solvent change method is noted. It was
found that solvent change method gives the practical yield in the range of 45 –
71%. The maximum yield was found 71.20%
in batch B4 Batch.
Table no. 3. Percentage
practical yield of spherical agglomerates
|
Sr. no. |
Batch code |
Percentage yield
(%) |
|
1 |
B1 |
45.55% |
|
2 |
B2 |
65.41% |
|
3 |
B3 |
41.87% |
|
4 |
B4 |
71.20% |
|
|
||
d. Determination of % drug content
The drug content in
spherical agglomerates by solvent change method was found to be maximum. It is
shown in table no.4. It was found to be in the range of 60% - 85%. It was
suggesting that solvent change method has good encapsulation of the drug.
Table no. 4. Drug content of
spherical agglomerates
|
Sr. no. |
Batch code |
% Drug content |
|
1 |
B1 |
69.23 |
|
2 |
B2 |
75.56 |
|
3 |
B3 |
64.35 |
|
4 |
B4 |
85.11 |
e.
FTIR spectra of Candesartan cilexetil
The IR spectra of Candesartan cilexetil shows broad
peak at 2866.67 cm-1 and 2938.98 cm-1. It belongs to the
valance vibration of the C-H bonds in the CH and CH2 groups. It shows broad peak at 1753.94 cm-1
it belongs to the C-O str of carboxylic acid. Spectra
of Candesartan cilexetil
shows some peaks at 1611.23 cm-1 and 1472.32 cm-1 it
shows presence of aromatic ring containing C-C str
bonding. Some of the peaks are visualized at 1345 cm-1 to 1238 cm-1
it indicates that presence of carboxylic acid esters and ethers with C-O str bonding. Last peak is visualized at 1075.12 cm-1
it belongs to the primary and secondary amine.
Fig.2. shows FTIR spectra of Candesartan cilexetil in the
range of 4000 cm-1 to 400 cm-1.
Fig. 2. FTIR spectra of Candesartan cilexetil
The IR spectra of PVP-K30 (Fig.
No.3.) shows 2857.02 cm–1 (C-H stretching vibrations), 1609.31cm–1
(C = O Carbonyl stretching), and 1238.08 cm–1 (C-N stretching
vibrations).
The results revealed no
considerable changes in the IR peaks of Candesartan cilexetil, when mixed with polymer PVP-K30. These
observations indicated the compatibility of PVPK30 with Candesartan
cilexetil. The FTIR spectrum of PVP-30 and Candesartan cilexetil is in Fig.
No.3. IR spectra indicated no well-defined interaction between the drug and
polymer.
Fig.3. FTIR spectra of Candesartan cilexetil and PVP–
k30
f. Powder X- ray diffraction study ( XRD )
The presence of numerous
distinct less diffused peaks in the X-Ray diffraction spectrum indicates that Candesartan cilexetil present as
a crystalline material. Sharper diffraction peaks indicate more crystallize the
drug. The powder XRD of Candesartan cilexetil is shown in Fig.no.4.
Fig. no.4. XRD graph of Candesartan cilexetil
g. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM)
The
optimized batch of spherical agglomerates of B1 to B4 were analyzed under
optical microscopy. It shows spherical shaped agglomerates having good crystallinity as well as round and ball like shape. The
smallest particle visualized under SEM was near about size 201.69µm and the
largest particle size was 445.23 µm. fig no.5,6,7,8. Indicates that images of
spherical agglomerated batch B1 to B4 respectively.
Fig
no.5. SA batch B1
Fig
no.6. SA batch B2
Fig
no.7. SA batch B3
Fig
no.8. SA batch B4
h.
In-vitro dissolution
studies of Prepared Spherical Agglomerates:
The
dissolution profile of prepared spherical agglomerates was shown in the table
no.5. dissolution profile of prepared agglomerates is compared with pure drug.
Because of presence of polymer PVP k-30 dissolution of Candesartan
cilexetil in the agglomerates which increases
dissolution rate. The prepared Batches of agglomerates in that Batch B2 and B4
shows dissolution rate up to73.12% and 70.31 % respectively.
Table no. 5. Percentage
drug release of pure drug and Spherical agglomerates
|
Sr. no. |
Time (mins) |
Pure drug |
%
Cumulative drug release |
||||
|
B1 |
B2 |
B3 |
B4 |
B5 |
|||
|
1 |
0 |
0.00±0.00 |
0.00±0.00 |
0.00±0.00 |
0.00±0.00 |
0.00±0.00 |
0.00±0.00 |
|
2 |
10 |
3.54±0.001 |
12.65±0.02 |
18.28±0.02 |
6.3±0.061 |
12.65±0.04 |
15.21±0.01 |
|
3 |
20 |
7.65±0.021 |
20.39±0.01 |
23.90±0.03 |
14.76±0.08 |
29.53±0.03 |
24.65±0.03 |
|
4 |
30 |
11.24±0.4 |
30.23±0.04 |
52.30±0.05 |
24.60±0.04 |
46.40±0.02 |
34.35±0.04 |
|
5 |
40 |
16.80±0.21 |
35.85±0.02 |
64.68±0.04 |
31.64±0.03 |
50.64±0.04 |
39.87±0.02 |
|
6 |
50 |
20.54±0.101 |
55.54±0.03 |
73.12±0.01 |
35.15±0.02 |
70.31±0.02 |
43.50±0.01 |
Fig no. 9. Percentage
drug release of pure drug and all batches of agglomerates
CONCLUSION:
Due
to the poor water solubility of Candesartan cilexetil it exhibited only 20.45% dissolution rate in the
50 min. But as comparing the prepared batches of spherical agglomerates it
shows increased dissolution rate as compared to the pure drug. Due to the
incorporation of hydrophilic polymer all batches shows enhanced dissolution
rate as well as solubility.
From
these above data it was found that batch B2 gives highest % cumulative drug
release i.e.73.12%. That’s why Batch B2 containing spherical agglomerates is
considered as optimized batch, because of high dissolution rate as compared to
the other batches.
As
the particle size small dissolution will be greater and if particle size is
large dissolution require more time. Also there is a large effect on the
addition amount of bridging liquid in the mixture. Rotation Speed in the
process is also having great effect on the size of the particle. High speed
process produces small sized particles or agglomerates which is having better
dissolution result which is shown in batch B4.
REFERENCES:
[1] Kirti K. Kamble, Kakasaheb R. Mahadik. Solubility
enhancement of olmesartan medoximil
by spray drying technique. Pelagia Research Library Der Pharmacia Sinica. 5(3) ;
2014: 18-27.
[2] Mudit Dixit, P. K. Kulkarni, Ashwini G. Kini, Akash Johri. Spherical agglomerates
of mefenamic acid by Solvent change method. An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2 (2) ; 2011 : 111-125.
[3] K.
Kranthi Kumar, Dr. L. Srinivas,
Dr. V. Sai Kishore, S. Naseeb Basha. Formulation and
evaluation of poorly soluble Febuxostat
orodispersible tablet. American Journal of Advanced Drug Delivery. 2(2) ; 2014
: 191-202.
[4] Poonam S. Karekar, Ashwini A. Yadav, Dhanashri S. Yadav. Enhanced
solubility and dissolution rate of Olmesartan medoxomil Using crystallo-co-agglomeration
technique. Pelagia Research Library, Der Pharmacia Sinica, 3(2) ; 2012
: 160-169.
[5] Janika Garg, Sadhna
Khatry, Sandeep Arora.. Spherical Crystallization: An Overview
International Journal Of Pharmacy and Technology. 4 (1) ; 2012 : 1909-1928
[6] Soni Varinder, Rathore M S. Spherical Agglomeration Techniques and their
Evaluation Parameters. International Journal of Drug Development and Research,
5(3) ; 2013 : 67-76.
[7] Mudit Dixit, Dr.P. K. Kulkarni And Ashwini G Kini. Spherical Agglomeration Of Ketoprofen
By Solvent Change Method. International Journal Of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Review And Research. 4 (3) ; 2010 : 129-135.
[8] Manish
R. Bhise, Sandip B. Sapkal, Mahesh B. Narkhede.
Formulation and evaluation of intraorally fast
dissolving tablet of olmesartan Medoxomil.
Scholars Research Library Der Pharmacia Lettre. 5 (1) ; 2013 : 232-237.
[9] Panchal Hardik K, Mrs. Kinjal Sanghvi, A Review On Spherical Agglomeration For
Improvement Of Micromeritic Properties And
Solubility. International Journal Of Pharmaceutical Research And Bio-Science.
3(2) ; 2014 : 570-579.
[10] E.
Hari Krishna, V. Rama Mohan Gupta, Mohan Krishna, S Jyothi, Rajanikar Dasari, Preparation And Evaluation Of Sodium CMC Zaltoprofen Spherical Agglomerates For Direct Compression.
Journal Of Pharmacy Research. 6: 2013 : 61-67.
[11] Parthasarathi Keshavarao Kulkarni, Mudit Dixit, Achin Jain. Spherical Agglomeration of Naproxan
by Solvent Change Method. stamford journal of
pharmaceutical science. 4(1) ; 2011 : 1-8.
[12] Vishal Dhiman, Gaurav Jain, Vaibhav Jagtap, R.V.Sheorey. Formulation
and In-Vitro evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of Telmisartan.
International Journal Of Pharmacy and Life Sciences. 3 (11) ; 2012 : 2159-2164
Received on 08.07.2016 Accepted on 22.08.2016
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2016; 6(4): 217-222.
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5713.2016.00032.5